Posts Tagged ‘Shoebury’

If you have 2 minutes, why not complete our SPAM FREE questionnaire so that we can improve Beyond the Point? LINK

At the outbreak of World War II, the Port of London was the busiest port in the world. As such, a large proportion of supplies to the UK entered by ships navigating the Thames. The German Navy quickly sought to put a stranglehold on this route, and to this end, utilised a new secret weapon – the magnetic influence mine. Whilst there were different variants of this mine, in simplistic terms, the mine was detonated by the presence of a large magnetic object – such as a steel hulled ship – passing in close proximity, without having to make physical contact. So successful was this that in the first few months of the war, over one hundred ships were sunk in the Thames Estuary alone. It was clear that urgent action was needed to stem these losses, and as most mines were laid by aircraft, ships were requisitioned and used as mobile anti aircraft units. However, this was not altogether successful, and a more satisfactory solution was needed.In the early years of the war, Guy Maunsell, a civil engineer, had produced plans for offshore defences.

At the time his ideas were considered somewhat eccentric, but he was asked to submit plans for an offshore fort as an effective means of dealing with the laying of the mines. Plans were drawn up, and after some modification, approval was given for the manufacture and installation of four offshore forts. These were of mainly reinforced concrete construction, built on land on a lozenge shaped reinforced base, and towed out to sea where they were sunk onto the seabed.

The source for this blog post

Each fort accommodated approximately 120 men, housed mainly within seven floors of the 24’ diameter twin reinforced concrete legs and were under the control of the Navy. They were all placed in position between six and twelve miles offshore between February and June, 1942 and became operational immediately. Each fort accommodated up to 265 men.

war

After the war the forts were placed on ‘care and maintenance’. However as the need for their continued use diminished, they were abandoned, and the guns removed from the Army forts, in 1956.The Nore fort was dismantled in 1959 being considered a hazard to shipping (two towers were lost following a collision in 1953 whilst another in 1963). In 1964, Radio Caroline began broadcasting from a ship moored outside UK Territorial Waters.

Four of the forts survive, abandoned since they were decommissioned in the 1950s. Each played host to pirate radio stations in the 1960s. Since this time, Roughs has been occupied by the founder of Radio Essex, Roy Bates, who in 1967 declared the fort an independent state: The Principality of Sealand. Its independence is not recognised and as with all the Maunsell forts, it is still considered UK territory (though this is often disputed). In 2007, there was talk of The Pirate Bay relocating to Roughs, in a bid to take advantage of its disputed territory claim and get around toughened copyright law in Sweden. This fell through. The plans can be seen below. (Right click image then select open in new tab to enlarge the picture)

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Today, Redsand Fort as the only complete structure as built in wartime is the focus of attention by Project Redsand, a group of enthusiasts with the aim of reinstating the Fort to its original built condition. Having had an underwater survey carried out by the Port of London Authority at a cost of around £5,000, work has progressed to installing a new access system to the G1 tower thanks to the generosity of Mowlem Marine (now Carillion) of Northfleet. Built at a cost of approximately £40,000, the access system enables project members to board the tower to commence restoration. The BTP Boys hope to venture out one day!

Useful Websites:

Project Redsand - http://www.project-redsand.com/index.htm

Maunsell Forts - http://log.doggerland.net/2011/02/23/maunsell-forts/

1943 Pictures - https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.355003671221371.102739.100281160026958&type=3

Churchill at Shoebury fires the Sten Gun

Posted: December 27, 2012 by BTP Liam in Case Study, Various
Tags: , , ,

For a few years now I have seen the below photograph of Sir Winston Churchill test-firing the ‘Machine Carbine, Sten’, which is most commonly known as the Sten sub-machine gun. A sub-machine gun is a fairly small machine gun which fires pistol-sized bullets (pretty much any fairly small machine gun which is smaller than a rifle), and the Sten was Britian’s own which served through World War Two up until the 1960s. It was an answer to avoid having to import expensive Thompson sub-machine guns (a.k.a. ‘Tommy Guns’) from America, although it was cheap and not very sturdy. Despite this, it had a slower rate of fire and greater accuracy than the Tommy gun, meaning it could be utilized at greater distances effectively. It was Brtian’s own SMG, and was issued to non-front-line troops (as a self-defense weapon for artillery firers e.t.c.), to officers, and to the Home Guard, as well as Commandos who favored stealthy combat, and Paratroopers who needed a lightweight and compact weapon when they jumped. Others were given Lee-Enfield rifles.

Little did I know that this photograph of Churchill with the Sten was taken at the experimental battery in Shoebury (see more on the remains/history of the place on this site), now ‘Gunner’s Park’ – a nature reserve holding numerous battery constructions. It was taken in 1941, and it’s owner – the Imperial War Museum, states

Caption Winston Churchill took aim with a Sten gun during a visit to the Royal Artillery experimental station at Shoeburyness in Essex, England, United Kingdom, 13 Jun 1941
Photographer Horton

 

person_churchill2

A Sten Mk.II – This was the most common type of Sten used in WW2

 

We then headed into the actual garrison – the housing area for the troops working on the batteries. Here is a description of the site, and Officer’s Mess (the actual housing area now revamped as properties) from officers-mess.co.uk.

The Shoebury Garrison Dating back to 1797 when a signal station was erected at the start of the Napoleonic War, Shoebury Garrison is steeped in British Military history and has long been associated with the valour of the armed forces. Having housed Royal Artillery and Gunnery schools since the early 1800′s, Shoebury Garrison is now recognised as an area of national importance and is protected – much of it as a conservation area. Many of the historical buildings are listed and a great deal of the site within the ancient ramparts is protected by English Heritage as scheduled ancient monuments. The Officers’ Mess The buildings of The Officers’ Mess are undoubtedly the most prestigious listed buildings within the historic Shoebury Garrison. The grand and elegant regeneration respects and enhances the heritage of this wonderful site. The sophisticated re-development includes a section of the original Coast Guard Station, the only pre-Garrison building on the site, that now forms part of the South-facing side of The Officers’ Mess. As you walk through the stunning landscaped grounds your eye is lead to the spectacular Grand Hall where some of the original features have been restored to an outstanding finish with beautiful high ceilings and grand features and characteristics to complement its appearance. The very fabric of The Officers’ Mess is imbued with the privilege and honour of its illustrious past – just a mere glance inside the building provides a small window on a forgotten era of nobility and grandeur. An ethos that is about to come back to life inside the walls of this imposing and magnificent building.

So the long tiring day trip continued, this time going further north-west from the ‘point’ which Shoebury forms on the map.  Along the beach, nearest the battery, were two search-light castemates – one nearest had graffiti all over, whilst the further one along had little and featured the searchlight runner-rails intact (a metal circular strip in which the searchlight could be swiveled around on). These searchlights would have been used to spot invaders in the sea at night, and to mark where the nearby batteries should target.

Searchlight post 1 (also at start of article)

The view the searchlights would have taken advantage of

Searchlight post 2

The rail for the searchlight

We then came across a pillbox built into the seawall – probably the older one as it wasn’t level with the current seawall. It was blocked of at the back by a concrete block shoved in the doorway (come on at least be courteous to these bunkers!).

The pillbox top

The pillbox front with loophole

And finally we saw a boathouse used to store a boat which was part of the defence in some manner.

The roof

The inside

And that’s all for this part – we’ve still got to the actual garrison itself and the Cold War anti-submarine boom to do, so this trip will be a long 6-parter!

For pictures of the whole day from me, go to these addresses:

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.334559163232954.78255.238743826147822&type=3

And for Joe’s go here:

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.334429693245901.78232.238743826147822&type=3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAvQBoxslH0

 

So, after visiting the huge quick-firing heavy battery (http://beyondthepoint.co.uk/2012/05/05/shoebury-batterygarrison-visit-part-2-big-bunkers/), we proceeded to a pair of Victorian Gunpowder mills, tucked behind a building-type temporary metal fence. Luckily the area was clear, and the fence could be easily slipped out of the rubber base, joining the fences together, so we could quickly slip inside. There was a large possibly victorian outdoor building amongst a building material storage site, which was too fenced off. This is probably why the mills fell within the fence too, yet were still a distance off. It was all probably part of renovation for the garrison. One building was sealed, yet another’s door was open. It consisted of a doorway room with a cupboard, an the main room. In slight lighting from a mobile phone, it became a cosy place. It was immaculate in quality, and featured perspex over some sort of gunpowder funnel coming out of the wall. Along with the other building having lead covering part of its roof, we could tell that some sort of failed renovation project had been carried out on these buildings. The paint inside was immaculate, and all the little pegs existed on the walls for various items.
With a nice warm dim lamp, I could have lived inside there! A few cobwebs did cover the corners however.

The two mills happened to stand on what I only recently found out to be a Viking rampart/some kind of earthen wall to defend a Viking base. This was a nice thing to know, but a little too late to be able to embrace whilst we were there. The Vikings were essentially travelling raiders by boat, and with Scandinavia opposite the Thames, you can see why they might have ended up having a look around this area.

The possibly Victorian out-building

The two mills with earthen Viking rampart behind

The inaccessible mill with signs of later redevelopment attempts

Da boys in da house

The accessible one

The door-room looking into the main room

Various internal shots:

Some later reinforced device probably for gunpowder linked between the two rooms

 

Next on the trip was the various WW2 defence buildings on the seafront, and later the Cold War anti-submarine boom, so keep your eyes peeled.
For pictures of the whole day from me, go to these addresses:

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.334559163232954.78255.238743826147822&type=3

And for Joe’s go here:

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.334429693245901.78232.238743826147822&type=3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAvQBoxslH0

Continuing on around Gunner’s Park (part one can be seen here http://beyondthepoint.co.uk/2012/04/21/shoebury-batterygarrison-visit-part-1-the-ranges-jetty-and-gunners-park/) we came across yet another smaller gun mount building. This one appeared to be newer than the others, although I belive it was just used more through the second half of the 20th Century, although was of WW2 origin, being built over an older building.

This shows the whole building – to the left the old probably Victorian part, with steps used to get ontop. The WW2 part is right.

Filming!The actual gun would have been most likely mounted ontop of the building, which featured a flat concrete circular surface, referencing to the possibility. Inside it featured an old electrical light and the three-pronged light switch. It also had a large semi-circular recession probably to angle the gun ontop.

The gun mount ontop

An interesting shot inside

Two possible shelf holders inside

So we opened up the cover and woh, and hairy surprise lurks whithin ;)

An old strip light label, dated 1963 if I can remember rightly

The boys are at home! Inside the building

We then carried on walking and managed to find a gap in a fence to climb down into a gun ‘pit’-style mount – I had to have a hand getting up again though! It would have held a 9.2″ breech loading gun (it shot bullets which were 9.2″ wide and were loaded directly into the barrel at its base).

A nice view from the top focused on a crisp stick

Me taking a photo of the pit. These chain links may have held the gun in, and the square compartments could have held empty or new shells.

We should have been able to just walk into it but water flooding covered part of the floor near the entrance.

After this, we then walked abit of a way to the bunker to rule them all, so big in fact that it resembled a medieval castle! It was a WW2 construction, known as the Heavy Quick Firing Battery, and would have housed a gun in each of the three circular mounts ontop which project down the buildings face. It featured mechanical lifts inside to hoist the shells in a continuous magazine to the top.

A cracking image of a wartime pose – it has hardly changed

A frontal shot of the building today

A great beast in the distance

A closeup

The rear

Note one of the doorways has ‘store’ intactly engraved into it

Back a few years ago, before the park was developed into a public area, there was no shuttering on the building and access was as simple as stroll in. We could clearly not get inside, but here is an image courtesy of The Coalhouse Fort Project before it was sealed off of the shell lifts which still remain inside:

Keep an eye out next time for more bunkers and a Victorian treat!

In the footsteps of giants…

For my pictures go here:

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.334559163232954.78255.238743826147822&type=3

And for Joe’s go here:

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.334429693245901.78232.238743826147822&type=3

And for a YouTube documentary, go here, although wind obstructed the sound (subtitles have been put in)